|
|
Bankia leadership replies that there was no report warning of the hole until March Open war between the Rodrigo Rato-Ángel Acebes tandem and Deloitte over the final responsibility for the Bankia hole. While the auditor accuses the entity's directors of ignoring the problem since October, the former leadership will argue that it did not receive any report warning of the critical situation of the accounts until weeks before the nationalization. the former directors are compiling all the documentation that the former management of Bankia received from Deloitte in the months prior to the intervention of the entity by the State. Its objective will be to use these reports in court to defend itself against Deloitte 's accusations of having turned a deaf ear to the auditor's warnings that warned of the serious hole in the entity supposedly eight months ago. Those around Rato and Acebes consider the auditor responsible for the fact that the bank's accounts were not previously communicated to Bankia 's leadership . They claim that they were not aware of the true hole in the entity until the month of March.
And this is stated in the reports that they received and are now examining in detail. Deloitte accuses Bankia of passivity The consulting firm Deloitte , in charge of auditing the accounts of Bankia and its parent company Banco Financiero y de Ahorros (BFA) and whose refusal to sign last year's results precipitated the intervention of Middle East Mobile Number List the entity, has leaked that it reported last October to the directors of the problems that the bank was going through . Financial sources consulted by ECD explain that the auditor is not willing to assume full responsibility for the Bankia scandal, and is now seeking to share commitments with the entity's former management team. There are no reports that alerted about the hole According to sources close to Rato and Acebes , Deloitte's own reports will allow them to defend themselves at the National Court.
The analysis of the documents carried out by its most trusted lawyers and advisors allows us to corroborate that no report emphasized the valuation of the investees or the tax credits until last March , two pieces of information that were ultimately key to Bankia's future events. Not only that. They will allege that the bank's board of directors was also not informed by any Deloitte executive of the anomalies in the 2011 accounts until a month before the nationalization. A director of the entity consulted by ECD confirms that he was not aware of Deloitte 's discrepancies until precisely four months ago. Until that date, the auditor did not question the figures from the previous year , nor did it give any alarm signal that could give rise to a contingency plan at Bankia.
|
|
發表於 12:01:52